Final answer:
The assertion that points in court may be adjusted by a certain percentage is not reflective of actual court proceedings, which are based on law, precedent, and specific case details. Sentences are influenced by guidelines assigning point values, but this is not a simple percentage adjustment. Appeals can be made following a verdict, and precedent plays a crucial role in future court decisions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'T OR F: In court your points may be adjusted +/- 10 % based on the case.' is not accurate in the context of judicial proceedings. In court, the judge or jury follows the legal framework and guidelines to issue a verdict or sentence; points or percentages don't factor into these decisions. When a sentence is determined in the federal system, guidelines assign point values to various offenses which may influence the sentence, but this is not a simple matter of adjusting points by a percentage and is highly specific to the details of a case. In criminal cases, the jury decides on guilt, and the judge determines the penalty in a trial court. This process might be influenced by respective laws, precedent, and circumstances rather than an arbitrary percentage adjustment.
Once a verdict is reached it is possible for either the prosecution or the defense to appeal the decision to a higher court, such as a special appellate court or the state supreme court, depending on the state. Furthermore the Supreme Court operates with a system of precedents through its majority opinions, which can influence future court decisions. However, there's no mechanism by which points in court are adjusted by any percentage 'based on the case' in a general sense. The intricacies of the legal system, sentencing guidelines and court proceedings are all multi-faceted and not reducible to a standard point adjustment system.