Final answer:
Expected outcomes of antiarrhythmic therapy typically include no evidence of injury, which is related to stabilization of heart rhythm, and potentially the client being free of nausea if it is a side effect. Assessment of infection, adequate urination, and condition of oral mucous membranes, although important for overall patient care, are not directly tied to the outcomes of antiarrhythmic therapy.
Step-by-step explanation:
When evaluating a client who is receiving antiarrhythmic therapy, the expected outcomes would typically focus on the stabilization of the heart rhythm, reduction of symptoms associated with arrhythmia, and preventing complications related to arrhythmias. The following would be interpreted as expected outcomes:
- A) No evidence of injury is seen as antiarrhythmic drugs aim to prevent arrhythmia-related complications such as falls or accidents due to syncope.
- B) No evidence of infection is seen, however, this is not directly related to the antiarrhythmic therapy itself but rather to the overall health status and care.
- C) Client being free of nausea could be relevant if nausea was a side effect of the antiarrhythmic drug or a symptom of the arrhythmia itself.
- D) Client urinates adequately could be relevant if certain antiarrhythmic medications have diuretic effects or affect renal function.
- E) Oral mucous membranes being intact and moist is a general indicator of good hydration status but is not specific to antiarrhythmic therapy outcomes.
It is essential to consider the specific context and specific antiarrhythmic medication when evaluating expected outcomes in a patient.