Final answer:
The Board may deviate from the disciplinary guidelines if there are mitigating or aggravating factors, with a requirement to provide a rationale for such deviations to ensure fairness and transparency.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Board may deviate from the disciplinary guidelines in specific cases where mitigating or aggravating factors exist. Mitigating factors can include the absence of a prior disciplinary record, evidence of good character, and any remedial actions taken by the individual. Aggravating factors may include a pattern of similar violations, the harm caused to others, and any potential danger to the public resulting from the offender's conduct.
In such circumstances, the Board has discretion to impose a lesser or greater discipline than the guidelines typically suggest. The decision to stray from the guidelines should be accompanied by a clear explanation, reflecting the rationale for the deviation in order to ensure transparency and fairness in the disciplinary process.
It's important to note that each disciplinary board may have its own set of rules and norms when it comes to deviations from standard practices, and these should be reviewed in the relevant bylaws or statutes governing the specific professional or organizational context.