Final answer:
When filing a tort against a business, it is necessary for the plaintiff to demonstrate that the business breached the duty of care to them, leading to harm or damages. The duty of care is a legal obligation to act with a certain standard of conduct, and the plaintiff must show the defendant's failure in this regard directly caused their injury.
Step-by-step explanation:
When filing a tort against a business, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant breached the duty of care. This means that the business had a legal obligation to act in a certain way toward the plaintiff, and that it failed to do so, leading to harm or damages to the plaintiff. The concept of duty of care is central to many tort cases, including negligence, and it requires the plaintiff to demonstrate that the defendant's actions or lack of actions directly caused the harm in question.
In contrast, the other options, like damaging property intentionally, conspiring with a competitor, or violating the doctrine of sovereign immunity, relate to different legal issues and types of cases. For example, intentional damage to property would be a different kind of tort, often referred to as an intentional tort. Conspiring with a competitor would potentially be related to antitrust violations or business law, and sovereign immunity pertains to the inability to sue the government without its consent, which would not apply to a private business in a tort claim