230k views
4 votes
Reno v. Condon (2000), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Drivers' License Protection Act was:

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

In Reno v. Condon (2000), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Drivers' License Protection Act was constitutional.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Reno v. Condon (2000), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Drivers' License Protection Act was constitutional. The act allowed states to share information from driver's license records with law enforcement agencies for law enforcement purposes.

User Emile
by
8.1k points

Related questions

1 answer
0 votes
81.4k views
1 answer
1 vote
33.1k views
asked Oct 16, 2024 100k views
Paaske asked Oct 16, 2024
by Paaske
7.2k points
1 answer
0 votes
100k views