Final answer:
The one reason listed that is not typically grounds for revoking a physician's license is providing atypical care, as long as it adheres to professional standards and is not harmful. Revocation usually occurs due to incapacity, criminal conviction, or unprofessional conduct. The ethical concerns of active euthanasia, while important, are separate from causes of license revocation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the reasons why a physician's license might be revoked, which is a process that takes place when there are concerns about the physician's ability to practice medicine safely and professionally. The reasons for revocation typically include mental incapacity, physical incapacity, conviction of a crime, and unprofessional conduct. However, providing atypical care is not inherently a reason for revoking a license, assuming that atypical care still falls within the boundaries of professional standards and does not harm the patient. It is important to differentiate between innovative or unconventional practices that may benefit patients and those that are truly unprofessional or dangerous.
The discussion involving the wrongness of killing, the physician's role, and concerns over a potential slippery slope in the context of euthanasia highlights the complexity of medical ethics. While active euthanasia is a controversial and complex topic that raises ethical concerns about the role of a physician, it is a distinct issue from the professional misconduct that might warrant revoking a medical license.