Final answer:
A physician can be held guilty under the False Claims Act even without intent to defraud, as liability extends to acts of reckless disregard or deliberate ignorance of the truth. Additionally, colonists' objections to taxation were more about representation in tax-related decisions rather than the principle of taxation itself.
Step-by-step explanation:
Under the federal False Claims Act, it is true that a physician can be held guilty of submitting a false claim even if there was no intention to defraud the government. The Act allows for liability when a person knowingly submits a false claim to the government. 'Knowingly' is defined to include not only actual knowledge but also instances where the individual acted in deliberate ignorance or reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. Therefore, intent to defraud is not a necessary element for a violation to occur under the False Claims Act.
Regarding the colonial taxation issue, the statement that the colonists did not necessarily object to the principle of taxation, but rather how the tax money would be applied is true. The objection was more about the lack of representation in the decisions on how their taxes were being spent, which fueled sentiments that led to the American Revolution.