79.7k views
4 votes
If a physician explains to the patient the purpose of the proposed treatment but does not explain the alternative treatments (if any), the consent is probably not going to be held to have been valid

a-true
b-false

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

False. It is important for physicians to provide information about alternative treatments to ensure complete informed consent.

Step-by-step explanation:

False.

According to the principle of autonomy, which protects a patient's right to exercise agency and make decisions about their own health care, it is essential for physicians to provide all relevant information about proposed treatments and alternative options. Failure to inform the patient about alternative treatments may lead to incomplete informed consent. This violates the rule requiring informed consent, as patients should have a clear understanding of the risks and benefits of different treatment options before making a decision.

Not providing information about alternative treatments may also go against the principle of beneficence, which promotes the doctor's duty to act in the best interest of the patient. By withholding information, the physician may limit the patient's ability to make an informed decision about their treatment.

User Mindia
by
8.5k points