Final answer:
The framers claimed they had addressed their complaints primarily by petitioning the government for redress of grievances. Other approaches included coordinating economic boycotting actions and forming committees to unite against unfair British policies, all of which laid the groundwork for the development of a new government and the U.S. Constitution.
Step-by-step explanation:
The framers of the American Constitution and earlier representatives of the colonies claimed to have addressed their grievances by repeatedly petitioning the government for redress. This approach is detailed in historical records which show that in every stage of what they termed 'oppressions,' they sent petitions seeking to resolve issues through formal requests to the British Crown and Parliament. However, these petitions were met with dismissal and further injuries, as they were either ignored or led to increased tensions and punitive measures.
In the context of the American Revolutionary period, other methods such as forming the Continental Association to enforce a boycott of British goods and the formation of the Committees of Correspondence were also enacted to present a united front against British policies deemed unfair. The Continental Congress additionally sought to address a list of grievances and established a body to oversee the colonial response to what were known as the Intolerable Acts. These efforts culminated in the drive for a new system of governance, one that was eventually encapsulated in the drafting of a new Constitution, representative of the desires and expectations of the American states after gaining independence.
The response by the representatives prior to the Revolutionary War and the framing of the Constitution effectively involved a range of actions from diplomatic efforts like petitions, to coordinated economic resistance, and ultimately legislative reform through the development of the new American government.