Final answer:
In civil cases, disputes are typically between individuals or entities (A), and the aim is not punishment, but rather compensation or remedy, often in the form of monetary damages (D). The burden of proof is "beyond a preponderance of the evidence" (not "beyond a reasonable doubt" as in criminal cases, so C is incorrect), and the goal is not to punish the defendant, making B incorrect.
Step-by-step explanation:
Identifying accurate statements about civil cases:
- A) Civil cases involve disputes between individuals or entities. This is true, as civil cases are typically disputes where one party (the plaintiff) seeks compensation or remedy from another party (the defendant).
- B) The goal in civil cases is typically to punish the defendant. This is not accurate; the aim is to provide a remedy, often in the form of monetary compensation, to the plaintiff.
- C) The burden of proof in civil cases is "beyond a reasonable doubt." This is incorrect. In civil cases, the burden of proof is "beyond a preponderance of the evidence," which is a lower standard than "beyond a reasonable doubt," which applies to criminal cases.
- D) Monetary compensation (damages) is a common remedy in civil cases. This statement is accurate as monetary damages are often sought in civil litigations to compensate for harm or injury.