Question

In the case of "equal opportunity harassers" who harass both men and women, the courts tend to rule:​

Answer 1

The courts tend to rule that equal opportunity harassment is a violation of anti-discrimination laws. Harassment based on protected classes, such as gender, is illegal. The burden of proof is on the government or employer to demonstrate why the unequal treatment is justifiable.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the case of "equal opportunity harassers" who harass both men and women, the courts tend to rule that such harassment is a violation of anti-discrimination laws. Harassment based on protected classes, such as gender, is illegal in the workplace and educational institutions. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) defines sexual harassment as unwelcome sexual advances or conduct that interferes with a person's performance or creates a hostile working environment.

When it comes to discrimination, the courts apply more stringent rules to policies and actions that discriminate based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or national origin.

The burden of proof is on the government or employer to demonstrate why the unequal treatment is justifiable, not on the individual who alleges discrimination. Laws that treat men and women differently are sometimes upheld, but usually, they are not.