Question

According to federal regulations, which of the following best describes when expedited processing is granted?

A. When the requestor demonstrates a compelling need for prompt action.
B. When the request involves a matter of national security.
C. When the request is for a minor change to an existing approval.
D. When the request is for a routine administrative matter.

Answer 1

Expedited processing is granted when there is a compelling need for prompt action, such as threats to life or safety, or cases of urgent national interest like Bush v. Gore.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to federal regulations, expedited processing is granted in certain circumstances that warrant a faster response than normal processing times. Expedited processing is typically granted when the requestor demonstrates a compelling need for prompt action. This could involve situations where there might be a threat to someone's life or physical safety, or to the welfare of an individual. Additionally, federal courts may fast-track cases that have special urgency, such as when there is a conflict on an issue among the lower courts, decisions by an appeals court or a state court that conflict with precedent, and state court decisions that conflict with federal decisions. An example includes Bush v. Gore, which was expedited due to the pressing nature of the issue concerning the outcome of a presidential election.