Final answer:
B2C2WG critical paths could focus on lethal actions and influence, as well as stability and informing, in the context of military operations. Informational social influence is more likely when the answer is unclear and the group has recognized expertise. Iron triangles involve a symbiotic relationship between Congressional committees, executive agencies, and interest groups.
Step-by-step explanation:
Understanding B2C2WG Critical Paths
When considering B2C2WG critical paths, which probably stands for a military or strategic process such as 'Brigade and Below Command and Control Working Group', certain key aspects should be considered for effectiveness. However, without specific context, it's challenging to provide an accurate response. Generally, critical paths can center on decisions and actions that have significant outcomes. In the context likely described, lethal actions and influence might be relevant as they pertain to military strategy and operations. Stability and inform are also potential central points, as in a military context, stabilizing operations and informing both troops and the public are important concerns. When dealing with informational social influence, conditions such as unclear answers and the group having expertise will influence the likelihood of its occurrence. The aspect of iron triangles refers to the symbiotic relationship between congressional committees, executive agencies, and interest groups, showing a form of non-competitive, exclusive interaction.
Complex interdependence is characterized by the notion that states view the use of force as costly, preferring cooperation and institutional solutions, and recognize multiple paths for achieving their goals. The primary driver of modernization theory is industrialization. In collective decision-making, there's a bias towards maintaining the status quo. Small groups experience less severe collective action problems due to easier monitoring, less opportunity to free-ride, and stronger peer pressure.