Final answer:
The specific charges and convictions for Watts after his new trial were not provided, but references to other similar historical cases highlight the complexities and dynamics of retrials, how convictions are reached, and the effects of public opinion and potential judicial errors.
Step-by-step explanation:
Watts's charges and his conviction after the new trial were not explicitly listed in the provided references, which discussed various historical legal cases and injustices. However, general patterns can be observed across these cases regarding retrials, charges, and convictions.
For instance, Ernesto Miranda was retried without his confession as evidence, securing a conviction based on witness testimony, and Ronald Cotton was convicted again in a second trial later to be exonerated by DNA evidence. Additional cases demonstrate challenges faced by defendants and the role of public opinion, such as the Sacco and Vanzetti case, where protests followed the trial outcome along nativist and immigrant lines. In the historical context, these legal cases illustrate the complexities and dynamics of the American justice system, with particular emphasis on trial by jury, the influence of public opinion, and the potential for judicial errors.