Final answer:
Courts utilize Article 2 gap fillers when cases involve issues not directly addressed by UCC Article 2, such as contracts for the sale of goods that lack specific terms like price or delivery time.
Step-by-step explanation:
A court might utilize an Article 2 "gap filler" when dealing with cases that involve issues not directly addressed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 2. These "gap fillers" are provisions within the UCC that provide default rules for certain terms that were not expressly included in a contract for the sale of goods. For example, if a contract between a buyer and a seller does not specify the price, delivery time, or payment terms, the UCC provides default terms that the court can apply to enforce the contract fairly in the absence of specific agreement by the parties. Courts reference Article 2 when adjudicating disputes related to the sale of goods, particularly when the contracting parties have left one or more terms open or have come to an impasse over the interpretation of an incomplete or ambiguous contract term.