Final answer:
In the case of Michigan v. Summers, the Supreme Court addressed the authority to control people in the area when executing a search warrant. They held that police can detain and control the occupants in the immediate vicinity of the premises during the search, even without individualized suspicion.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the case of Michigan v. Summers, the authority to control people in the area while executing a search warrant was addressed by the Supreme Court. The Court held that when police have a valid search warrant for a premises, they can detain and control the occupants in the immediate vicinity of the premises, even if there is no individualized suspicion of wrongdoing. This is because the presence of individuals near the premises during the execution of a search warrant poses potential risks to the safety of law enforcement officers and the integrity of the search.
This authority allows police to prevent occupants from entering or leaving the area during the search, to minimize potential interference, prevent the destruction of evidence, and ensure the safety of the officers involved and the occupants of the premises.