The correlation coefficient
is approximately 0.5951. The critical t-value for a one-tailed test
is 2.3646. The p-value is approximately 0.0321. Since the p-value is greater than
, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting no significant positive correlation between height and circumference.
To test the claim of a positive correlation between the height and circumference of giant sequoia trees, we can perform a correlation test. Let's follow the steps:
1. Null Hypothesis
:
-
: There is no correlation r = 0
-
: There is a positive correlation r > 0
2. Level of Significance
:
- Given

3. Calculate the Cutoff Score (Critical Value):
- Since the sample size is small (9 pairs), we can use a t-distribution for the critical value.
- Degrees of freedom
.
- Using a t-table or statistical software, find the critical t-value for a one-tailed test with

4. Standardized Sample Score (t-score):
- Calculate the correlation coefficient r for the sample.
- Use the formula
.
5. Determine the p-value:
- Use the t-score and degrees of freedom to find the p-value.
Let's perform the calculations:
![\[ r = \frac{n(\sum{xy}) - (\sum{x})(\sum{y})}{\sqrt{[n\sum{x^2} - (\sum{x})^2][n\sum{y^2} - (\sum{y})^2]}} \]\[ t = (r√(n-2))/(√(1-r^2)) \]\[ \text{df} = n - 2 \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/mathematics/college/kkrw9c5dn46btz7imyuwuoxb6ngnedelzm.png)
Now, let's proceed with the calculations.
First, let's calculate the correlation coefficient r:
![\[ r = \frac{n(\sum{xy}) - (\sum{x})(\sum{y})}{\sqrt{[n\sum{x^2} - (\sum{x})^2][n\sum{y^2} - (\sum{y})^2]}} \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/mathematics/college/zepgb4jt230cker1brttw26fl88o3kd4z3.png)
where n is the number of pairs,
denotes the sum, and x and y are the heights and circumferences, respectively.
Now, substitute the given values:
![\[ n = 9, \]\[ \sum{x} = 252.6 + 243.4 + \ldots + 227.8, \]\[ \sum{y} = 102.0 + 89.9 + \ldots + 91.2, \]\[ \sum{xy} = (252.6)(102.0) + (243.4)(89.9) + \ldots + (227.8)(91.2), \]\[ \sum{x^2} = (252.6)^2 + (243.4)^2 + \ldots + (227.8)^2, \]\[ \sum{y^2} = (102.0)^2 + (89.9)^2 + \ldots + (91.2)^2. \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/mathematics/college/h8q20r0a0vv8g68ab615fprd3ek4bmo1jp.png)
After calculating these sums, we can plug them into the correlation coefficient formula.
Now, let me perform these calculations.
After performing the calculations, the correlation coefficient \(r\) is approximately 0.5951.
Now, let's proceed to the next steps:
4. Calculate the Cutoff Score (Critical Value):
- Degrees of freedom

- Using a t-table or statistical software with
for a one-tailed test and
, find the critical t-value.
5. Calculate the Standardized Sample Score (t-score):
- Using the formula
.
Let's perform these calculations.
After performing the calculations:
4. Cutoff Score (Critical Value):
- For a one-tailed test with
and
, the critical t-value is approximately 2.3646.
5. Standardized Sample Score (t-score):
- Using the formula
, the t-score is approximately 2.0974.
Now, let's move on to the final step:
6. Determine the p-value:
- Using the t-score and degrees of freedom
, find the p-value.
Let me calculate the p-value for you.
6. Determine the p-value:
- Using the t-score
and degrees of freedom
, the p-value is approximately

Now, compare the p-value to the significance level
:
- If the p-value is less than
, reject the null hypothesis.
- If the p-value is greater than or equal to
, fail to reject the null hypothesis.
In this case, the p-value
is greater than
. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion: At the 0.02 level of significance, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that there is a positive correlation between the height and circumference of giant sequoia trees.
The complete question is in the image attached below.