Final answer:
In general, a clause that requires an employee not to act against the interests of the employer during the employment relationship is not considered against public policy. Such clauses are often included to protect the employer's legitimate business interests.
Step-by-step explanation:
Public policy refers to the principles and values that guide the laws and regulations of a society. In the context of employment agreements, some clauses may be considered against public policy if they are deemed unfair or violate certain laws. In general, a clause that requires an employee not to act against the interests of the employer during the employment relationship is not considered against public policy. Such clauses are often included to protect the employer's legitimate business interests.
For example, a non-compete clause may be included in an employee agreement to prevent the employee from joining a competitor or starting a similar business after leaving the company. This helps protect the employer's trade secrets, customer relationships, and goodwill. However, there may be limitations on the enforceability of such clauses, and they must be reasonable in scope, duration, and geographic area.
It is important to note that laws and regulations vary by jurisdiction, so it is advisable to consult local labor laws or seek legal advice to understand the specific requirements and implications of employee agreements in a particular jurisdiction.