Final answer:
Holmes et al. (1998) posited that the Internet could provide a safe alternative for voyeurs, potentially increase their likelihood of offending, lead to contact sex crimes, or change their attitudes towards sexuality. These considerations highlight the complex relationship between freedom of expression, Internet censorship, and public safety.
Step-by-step explanation:
Holmes et al. (1998) discussed how the Internet could influence individuals with voyeuristic tendencies. The Internet can serve as a dual-edged sword; on one hand, it may provide a safer alternative to potential offending behavior by offering access to content within a private and controlled environment. On the other hand, it could potentially increase the likelihood of future offending due to the easy accessibility of illicit content. Furthermore, there's a concern that exposure to explicit materials online could lead to a shift in attitudes towards sexuality or even escalate to committing contact sex crimes. This complex issue is at the intersection of online privacy, security, control, and freedom of expression. In the United States, discussions around Internet censorship and regulation remain contentious as they touch upon fundamental freedoms, public safety, and the evolving nature of digital risks, as highlighted by Pew Research Center reports and First Amendment controversies.