Question

Should the underlying condition be listed as a secondary diagnosis if G89 is the principal diagnosis?

1) Yes
2) No
3) Not enough information provided

Answer 1

G89 as a principal diagnosis in ICD-10 coding should be accompanied by the secondary diagnosis of the underlying condition. The correct answer is yes; the underlying condition should be listed, as they are not mutually exclusive. Additional clinical focus boxes would provide context for preliminary diagnosis and treatment.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question addresses the correct coding of diagnoses using ICD-10 coding standards. In the context of this question, G89 refers to pain codes that are often used in the medical field. According to ICD-10 guidelines, if G89 is listed as the principal diagnosis, the underlying condition causing the pain should indeed be listed as a secondary diagnosis. Therefore, the underlying condition is not considered mutually exclusive with the G89 coding and should be included to provide a complete picture of the patient's health.

To further clarify, when exploring a preliminary diagnosis or treatment, one would typically refer to additional clinical details provided in a case study or patient's medical records. It is important to look at the 'previous Clinical Focus box' for past information or 'jump to the next Clinical Focus box' for additional context when diagnosing and treating a patient, following the standard medical protocol.