Final answer:
The standards of review for different classifications and fundamental rights are important aspects of constitutional law used by courts to evaluate the constitutionality of laws and government actions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The standards of review for different classifications and fundamental rights are important aspects of constitutional law and are used by courts to evaluate the constitutionality of laws and government actions. When it comes to classifications based on race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin, courts apply the strict scrutiny standard. Under strict scrutiny, the government must show a compelling governmental interest in treating people from these groups differently, and the law or action must be narrowly tailored and the least restrictive means available to achieve the goal. On the other hand, fundamental rights such as freedom of speech and religion are typically subject to a heightened scrutiny standard, where the government must show an important or substantial interest in infringing on these rights.