Final answer:
The concept mentioned typically refers to laws of inheritance where a beneficiary does not receive a bequest if it is missing from the estate ('ademption by extinction'), but could still inherit any residue. Historical laws, like in code 150 and 9, show how inheritance and commercial disputes were settled in the past.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Bequest is missing, bene takes nothing - CA, bene takes leftovers?' seems to be referencing laws or rules related to inheritance and bequeathing of property. In many legal systems, if a bequest (a specific item of personal property that is given in a will) is missing, then the beneficiary named to receive the bequest (often abbreviated as 'bene') typically inherits nothing. This concept is often referred to as ademption by extinction, where the specific gift fails because it is not part of the estate at the time of the death.
However, if there are leftovers, which could mean the residue of the estate after specific bequests have been distributed, the beneficiary might still inherit based on the terms of the will or according to the laws of intestacy if there is no will.
As an example, the code 150 allows a mother to bequeath all to one son if no claim is raised by the other sons, indicating the power to decide the distribution of the estate. Similarly, the code 9 illustrates the process for resolving commercial disputes around lost and found items, showing that laws in the past covered a range of issues from inheritance to commercial transactions.