Final answer:
A Federalist would argue for ratification of the US Constitution by emphasizing the necessity of a strong central government for national defense and economic growth, the balance of power between federal and state governments, and the safeguard of individual liberties through a promised Bill of Rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the debate over the ratification of the US Constitution, a Federalist would likely argue that a strong central government was essential for the survival and prosperity of the nation. They would point out that the abilities to maintain an army and navy, impose taxes, and ensure that states comply with federal laws were crucial for national defense and economic growth.
The Federalists believed that the new Constitution provided a beneficial balance of power between the national government and the states, with a federal system that could strengthen the union while protecting individual liberties through promised amendments like the Bill of Rights.
Furthermore, the Federalist Papers, written by leaders such as James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, presented cogent arguments for ratification, emphasizing that the new government would not evolve into tyranny. They stressed that the Constitution offered a means to correct the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, thereby creating a more effective and cohesive national policy.