Final answer:
The ideal person in terms of gender and virtue is not tied to being non-binary or any specific gender identity. Virtue can be embodied by individuals of any gender, and modern feminist and gender studies advocate for a more inclusive understanding that spans beyond the traditional binary view. Philosophical and psychological research shows that gender roles and moral perspectives are diverse and cannot be narrowed down to a single ideal based solely on gender.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assumption about the ideal person in terms of gender and virtue does not inherently correlate with being non-binary. Feminists and gender scholars have criticized traditional normative ethics that favor masculinity as the norm for virtues, suggesting that this view excludes the breadth of human experience. Instead, they propose that virtues such as bravery, integrity, and kindness are not gender-specific and can be embodied by anyone irrespective of their gender identity. Gender binarism, which is the categorization of individuals as either male or female, is a limited perspective that feminists and other scholars believe should be broadened to include multiple genders and performances.
Philosopher Judith Butler introduced the concept that gender is performative, where the roles and norms associated with genders are enacted by individuals. Furthermore, psychologist Carol Gilligan suggested that men and women may approach moral problems from different perspectives, highlighting the need for ethical systems that accommodate a range of gender identities. Sam Killermann's "Genderbread Person" illustrates the complexities of gender and sexuality and the various factors that comprise them, suggesting that no single model of 'the ideal person' can be tied to a specific gender identity or expression.