7.1k views
2 votes
Is the statement high or low context culture of communication: JULIA: Is there something in particular you're thinking of? [She looks at Akira expectantly. He says nothing.] So are we done here?

AKIRA: I don't think we should make decisions rashly.
(FRANK) JULIA: We really need to move fast on this, my friend, or the schedule is going to get away from us. So what, specifically, are you thinking? [Akira looks anxious, but doesn't answer.]
HOST: Julia and Akira seem to be at an impasse. Julia wants to make a decision and move forward, but Akira would like time for the contemplation of the work plan.

User Trollr
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The interaction showcases a low context communication by Julia demanding direct answers, contrasting with Akira's high context preference for non-verbal and contemplative communication.

Step-by-step explanation:

The conversation between Julia and Akira suggests a clash in communication styles often seen between high and low context cultures. High context communication relies heavily on non-verbal cues, implications, and the shared understanding that comes from communal backgrounds, while low context communication is straightforward, relying on clear verbal expressions and direct statements. Julia's insistence on a specific answer exhibits low context cultural traits, seeking direct communication, while Akira's reluctance and non-verbal cues indicate a preference for a high context approach, where more time is allowed for contemplation and indirect responses are more acceptable.

User MatijaG
by
7.6k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.