7.1k views
2 votes
Is the statement high or low context culture of communication: JULIA: Is there something in particular you're thinking of? [She looks at Akira expectantly. He says nothing.] So are we done here?

AKIRA: I don't think we should make decisions rashly.
(FRANK) JULIA: We really need to move fast on this, my friend, or the schedule is going to get away from us. So what, specifically, are you thinking? [Akira looks anxious, but doesn't answer.]
HOST: Julia and Akira seem to be at an impasse. Julia wants to make a decision and move forward, but Akira would like time for the contemplation of the work plan.

User Trollr
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The interaction showcases a low context communication by Julia demanding direct answers, contrasting with Akira's high context preference for non-verbal and contemplative communication.

Step-by-step explanation:

The conversation between Julia and Akira suggests a clash in communication styles often seen between high and low context cultures. High context communication relies heavily on non-verbal cues, implications, and the shared understanding that comes from communal backgrounds, while low context communication is straightforward, relying on clear verbal expressions and direct statements. Julia's insistence on a specific answer exhibits low context cultural traits, seeking direct communication, while Akira's reluctance and non-verbal cues indicate a preference for a high context approach, where more time is allowed for contemplation and indirect responses are more acceptable.

User MatijaG
by
7.9k points