Final answer:
The structural integrity of the educational system is often not considered when determining if an investigator has adequate resources, which includes long-term evaluation mechanisms, relevance, and effective utilization of resources.
Step-by-step explanation:
When determining if an investigator has adequate resources, one aspect that is not typically considered is the structural integrity of the educational system itself. Educational experts have observed that despite the injection of increased financial resources, there is no corresponding measurable gain in student performance. This inconsistency suggests that problems may be rooted in the system’s structure rather than simply the amount of resources allocated. The focus often lies on tangible resources like funding, but the organizational framework and capacity for effective utilization are equally important and can otherwise render additional finances ineffective.
Therefore, it is not just about how much financial support an investigator receives, but rather if there is a supportive structure in place to ensure those resources are managed and utilized effectively. For instance, long-term evaluation mechanisms, the timeliness of research, relevance to subject matter, and quality of methodology are aspects that might not be thoroughly considered but are crucial for the success of any educational endeavor. These elements contribute to the overall resourcefulness and can make a significant difference in the outcomes of educational research and interventions.