The correct answer is C. evidence from a follow-up review.
In paragraph 19, the author presents compelling evidence to counter the argument that extrinsic rewards diminish one's intrinsic motivation for a task. The key support comes from a follow-up review, which scrutinizes a body of research on the topic. The author points out that this comprehensive examination of studies found a nuanced relationship between extrinsic rewards and motivation. Contrary to the notion that rewards uniformly decrease interest, the follow-up review reveals a more intricate pattern. Specifically, the studies that reported a decline in motivation after rewards were predominantly those involving routine or mundane tasks. In contrast, studies incorporating tasks perceived as inherently enjoyable or "fun" did not exhibit the same adverse effects on motivation.
The author strategically leverages this evidence to challenge the counter argument, highlighting the importance of task nature in influencing the impact of extrinsic rewards. By referencing the follow-up review's findings, the author adds a layer of credibility and depth to the argument, suggesting that the relationship between rewards and motivation is contingent on various factors.
In summary, the author refutes the counter argument by citing evidence from a follow-up review, emphasizing that the impact of extrinsic rewards on motivation is task-dependent, with "fun" tasks showing a different pattern. Therefore, the correct answer is C. evidence from a follow-up review.
The question probable maybe:
2. In paragraph 19, what evidence does the author use to rebut the counter argument that studies showed extrinsic rewards decrease a person's desire to do a task?
A. studies showing children lost interest after being rewarded
B. studies that utilized a “fun” task
C. evidence from a follow-up review
D. psychologist reports