Final answer:
As a deontologist, Orroro should tell the truth to the police about providing bread to unhoused persons, because deontology emphasizes adhering to moral duties and rules over considering consequences.
Step-by-step explanation:
If Orroro is a deontologist, she should act according to her moral duties and obligations. Deontology, as a branch of ethics, suggests that people should adhere to their duties and rules regardless of the outcome or consequences. The scenario presents a conflict between the moral duty to assist those in need, which Orroro fulfills by giving away leftover bread, and the legal duty to obey the law that prohibits feeding unhoused persons.
In line with deontological ethics, Orroro should tell the truth about her actions when confronted by the police. Lying or remaining silent would be inconsistent with the principles of deontology, which prioritize moral integrity and the adherence to rules and duties. While this may lead to personal or legal repercussions, a deontologist would argue that one's obligation to act ethically is more important than the consequences of those actions.
The question also touches upon societal issues, such as the plight of those who find themselves on the outskirts of society, including homeless persons, domestic abuse survivors, and immigrants seeking a new life. Consider the story of Heidemarie Schwermer, who gave up money after witnessing the struggles of the homeless, thereby challenging what society considers valuable. Her actions reflect a profound ethical stance, questioning societal structures and the nature of currency and value.