Final answer:
By laying off employees, A Alo is compromising its social objective. While it may achieve cost savings and maintain competitiveness, this reduction in workforce adversely affects the social responsibility towards employees and community, impact which goes against the tenet of social objectives of management.
Step-by-step explanation:
The objective of management that a firm like A Alo, a mobility platform, will not be able to achieve by laying off employees is social objective. While achieving cost efficiency, driving profit, and ensuring the company's survival in a competitive market might justify the layoffs, the social objective is compromised.
This objective encompasses the company's responsibility toward its employees and society at large, including providing employment, fair wages, and contributing to the community's well-being. Laying off employees negatively impacts the social fabric, as it increases unemployment and can diminish the company's reputation as a socially responsible entity.
On the other hand, layoffs can potentially help a company stay competitive against firms offering better or cheaper products, thereby protecting its bottom line and possibly its survival. This could be especially relevant in industries characterized by perfect competition, where profits and losses tend to even out in the long run, making cost management crucial.