Dan aims to prove △PQR ∼ △TSR with vertices P(1,6), Q(7,4), R(3,2), S(−3,−1), and T(6,−4). Calculating slopes, Cheryl suggests PQ ∥ TS, but the attempt is incorrect. Dan should explore other pairs of corresponding sides and angles for an accurate similarity proof.
To prove the similarity between triangles △PQR and △TSR, Dan can demonstrate that the corresponding sides are proportional and the corresponding angles are congruent. Cheryl suggests focusing on the parallelism of sides PQ and TS.
(1) To find the slopes, use the formula: slope =
. For PQ:
![\[ \text{Slope of PQ} = (4 - 6)/(7 - 1) = -(2)/(6) = -(1)/(3) \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/mathematics/high-school/6r7bs0scq7kggvdd5e561hgbez5y9xkfmi.png)
For TS:
![\[ \text{Slope of TS} = ((-1) - (-4))/((-3) - 6) = (3)/(9) = (1)/(3) \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/mathematics/high-school/xjcjkic2j1cdsv4reuc3ev5eaxvtno1b46.png)
(2) The congruence statement:
![\[ \text{Slope of PQ} = -(1)/(3) \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/mathematics/high-school/hmfgejuy93nnvkrn89vutz6favrl0wsks6.png)
![\[ \text{Slope of TS} = (1)/(3) \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/mathematics/high-school/z4z3ww8grhk8ml8mo6gk5eeeno6t9xadru.png)
![\[ \angle P \cong \angle T \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/mathematics/high-school/idllf4942xjgfij7a00x3ped6hu3m35ikh.png)
The slopes of PQ and TS are negative reciprocals, indicating that the lines are perpendicular, not parallel. To prove the similarity, Dan should focus on other pairs of corresponding sides and angles, as the current attempt to show parallelism is not accurate.