Final answer:
Justice Brown's arguments contain flaws such as an appeal to emotion, use of irrelevant characteristics, and spurious connections based on gender, which dilute the argument's validity.
Step-by-step explanation:
Justice Brown's arguments are presented with flaws that bring into question their validity. One significant issue in these arguments is the appeal to emotion, which can undermine the logical structure of the argument by diverting attention away from factual evidence and relying on emotional responses. Moreover, using irrelevant characteristics such as religion to judge competency is also flawed as it has no direct bearing on the ability or qualifications of an individual. Additionally, the arguments presented by Justice Brown make a spurious connection based on gender, which is a hasty generalization that fails to recognize the individual merits or failings of the people in question.
Criticisms and rebuttals against Justice Brown's arguments suggest that there is a lack of evidence to support the claims being made. The selection and interpretation of premises do not seem to adequately back the conclusion drawn. This indicates that Justice Brown's argument commits various informal fallacies, highlighting that the argument may be convincing on an emotional level but lacks the necessary logical structure and evidence-based reasoning to be considered sound.