Question

Kimmy Jordan, housekeeper for Holiday Inn Hotel, says that part of working in a union hotel is deciphering the contract and comparing it with the employee handbook. From this statement, it would appear that Kimmy works:

a. Under an explicit contract that would not be enforceable in court
b. Under an implicit contract that is not enforceable
c. Under an implicit contract of job security
d. Under an explicit contract that would be enforceable in court

Answer 1

Kimmy Jordan's role at the Holiday Inn Hotel, detailed by assigning specific contract interpretation tasks, is indicative of employment under an explicit contract that outlines clear job terms and is legally enforceable.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the statement of Kimmy Jordan, it would appear that she works under an explicit contract that would be enforceable in court. An explicit contract in the context of employment is a legal agreement signed by both the employer and employee, outlining terms such as salary, responsibilities, rights, benefits, and conditions for termination. Additionally, working in a unionized environment often involves decoding both the union contract and the employee handbook which further emphasizes the presence of structured, legal frameworks governing her employment.

Furthermore, an explicit contract provides a level of security through clear stipulations on job expectations and protections. It contrasts with an implicit contract, which suggests an understanding that employers will protect wages during economic downturns, and employees will forgo large pay increases during prosperous times. This wage-setting behavior acts as a mutual insurance, balancing financial stability against potential wage increases in differing economic conditions.