Final answer:
Drive theories and incentive theories of motivation disagree on whether all motivations are equally strong or if some take priority over others.
Step-by-step explanation:
Drive theories and incentive theories of motivation differ in their explanations and positions on the strength and priority of different motivations. Drive theories suggest that motivations are equally strong and that all motivations arise from physiological needs that need to be satisfied. These theories propose that deviations from homeostasis create psychological drive states that direct behavior to meet the need and ultimately bring the system back to homeostasis.
On the other hand, incentive theories emphasize the role of external factors or rewards in motivation. They argue that motivations vary in strength and that some motivations may take priority over others based on the presence of extrinsic rewards or incentives. For example, extrinsic rewards like money may have a stronger impact on motivation compared to intrinsic rewards like praise. If individuals expect to receive extrinsic rewards, their intrinsic motivation for the task may be reduced. However, if extrinsic motivation is presented as a surprise, intrinsic motivation may persist. Overall, drive theories focus on physiological needs and internal factors, while incentive theories emphasize external factors and rewards.