Final answer:
Nappi's adaptation of a myth likely alters the original by maintaining core themes while omitting specific details and introducing new elements to relate to contemporary issues or themes, such as emphasizing a transgender narrative or recontextualizing borrowed motifs.
Step-by-step explanation:
The adaptation of a myth by Nappi likely differs from the original story in terms of the specific details and elements that are emphasized or omitted. In accordance with the principles mentioned by Lévi-Strauss, an adaptation might retain only the essential mythemes of action and consequence, removing localized details to highlight universal themes. This can be observed in the analysis of earth-diver myths, where despite cultural differences, the key elements remain the same: a creator deity, an intermediary, and creation of humans from earth components. An adaptation might also differ in the portrayal of characters and events to resonate better with contemporary audiences or to impart new interpretations and messages.
For example, a modern adaptation might emphasize gender issues as highlighted in the Roman story of Iphis, transforming it to perhaps more clearly represent a transgender narrative that resonates with current social discussions. Similarly, borrowing motifs from earlier traditions is not uncommon, as the Hebrew Bible incorporates elements from Mesopotamian legends. Thus, Nappi's adaptation might also include such borrowed elements but recontextualized to fit a new narrative purpose.