48.4k views
3 votes
Melia is writing an argumentative text about year-round schooling. Her

aim is that year-round schooling is not the answer to the decline in student
chievement and engagement.
hich example below best supports her claim?
OA. an interview with a student from a year round school
B. a newspaper article highlighting high performance year round
schools
C. a research journal revealing data that both traditional and year
round schooling have the same impact on student growth
D. personal story about summer school

User BlackEye
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The best example to support Melia's claim that year-round schooling does not improve student achievement and engagement is research data showing no significant difference in student growth between traditional and year-round schooling. The correct answer is option C.

Step-by-step explanation:

Melia is writing an argumentative text about year-round schooling and is making the claim that it is not the answer to the decline in student achievement and engagement. The example that best supports her claim is C. a research journal revealing data that both traditional and year-round schooling have the same impact on student growth. This evidence suggests that changing the schooling schedule alone does not significantly alter student outcomes, countering the argument that year-round schooling is a beneficial solution to increasing student engagement and achievement.

User Rajnish Mishra
by
8.1k points