Question

Evidence from the Upper Paleolithic in Northeast Asia shows that there is no evidence for occupation prior to the initial occupation of the New World.

A)True
B)False

Answer 1

The claim that there is no evidence of occupation in Northeast Asia before the New World's occupation is false. Archaeological findings show evidence of early human presence in Northeast Asia and the Americas, including predating the Clovis culture, though some findings are contested.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that there is no evidence of occupation in the Upper Paleolithic in Northeast Asia prior to the initial occupation of the New World is false. Archaeological evidence from the Paleolithic period in regions like Northeast Asia and Southeastern China indicates human presence and the development of early societies with distinctive agricultural practices, symbolic language, and stone tool production. Additionally, pre-Clovis sites in the Americas suggest a more complex scenario of human occupation than previously believed, with evidence of human presence before the Clovis culture, pushing back the dates of initial occupation.

Furthermore, evidence from sites across the Americas, such as the contested sites of Monte Verde in Chile and Topper in South Carolina, suggests even earlier dates of human presence that remain highly debated. As new discoveries emerge, they continue to challenge and refine our understanding of global human migration, including the occupation of Northeast Asia and the New World.