Final answer:
The statement is false; logic is concerned with the validity of arguments and does not involve the virtue of the reasoning itself. The evaluation of an argument involves both logical analysis and truth assessment, but one's world view does not determine the logic's validity.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement is false because logic itself, based on reason, does not inherently hold virtue; its virtue depends on the application and context set by the individual's world view, which is subjective and varies from person to person. The proper role of logic is to ensure that if the premises are true, the conclusion necessarily follows—this is the hallmark of a valid argument. However, the truth of an argument's premises is a separate matter and can be influenced by world views.
When analyzing an argument, it's important to distinguish between two different assessments: logical analysis and truth assessment. Logical analysis is concerned with the form of the argument and whether the premises provide sufficient support for the conclusion. This involves checking the argument's validity. If the premises do indeed support the conclusion, the argument is considered logically valid. Whether or not the premises are actually true is where the truth assessment comes in. This is where your world view may play a role in evaluating the premises' veracity. But it doesn't affect the logical structure of the argument—logic and truth are distinct entities.
A person's inference to a belief, especially through deductive reasoning, can only be as true as the premises it is based on. Thus, if the input beliefs or premises are incorrect, the conclusion will also be faulty, regardless of the argument's logical structure. Philosophers and logicians seek to use logical reasoning to eliminate inconsistencies, which can be seen as evidence against a proposition's truth.