Final answer:
Ammonia (NH₃) has a higher specific heat capacity than Freon-12, indicating that it could theoretically be more efficient as a refrigerant because it can absorb more heat without its temperature rising significantly. However, Freon-12 was previously preferred over ammonia due to its reduced toxicity and greater stability, despite having a lower specific heat capacity.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question concerns the efficiency of different substances used as refrigerants, specifically ammonia (NH₃) and Freon-12, which is a type of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC). Efficiency in this context refers to the ability of a refrigerant to absorb heat without undergoing a significant increase in temperature, and it is determined by the substance's specific heat capacity. The specific heat capacity is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one gram of a substance by one degree Kelvin.
Given that ammonia has a specific heat of 2.24 J/(g*K) and Freon-12 has a specific heat of 0.91 J/(g*K), ammonia can absorb more heat per gram before its temperature rises, compared to Freon-12. Therefore, in terms of specific heat capacity, ammonia (NH₃) would theoretically be more efficient as a refrigerant. However, Freon-12 was created as an alternative to ammonia due to its reduced toxicity and greater stability, not necessarily for its specific heat capacity. It is also noteworthy that CFCs like Freon-12 have been largely phased out due to their damaging effects on the ozone layer.
In conclusion, though ammonia has a higher specific heat capacity, the choice of refrigerant must also consider factors like toxicity, flammability, and environmental impact. Therefore, considering the given information on specific heat capacity alone, the answer to which substance would be most efficient as a refrigerant is ammonia (NH₃).