Final answer:
We fail to reject the null hypothesis since the p-value of 0.0558 is greater than the significance level of 0.05, indicating not enough evidence that rural teens drive more than the national average.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the information provided, the dad conducted a hypothesis test to determine if teens living in rural areas drive more miles than the national average for teenagers, which is 7,624 miles per year. The sample data showed an average of 7,701 miles per year with a standard deviation of 336 miles. The p-value obtained from the test was 0.0558. To make a decision about the null hypothesis, we compare the p-value to the significance level. Typically, a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 is used, meaning if the p-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis assuming sufficient evidence against it.
Since the p-value of 0.0558 is slightly greater than the common alpha level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that there isn't enough statistical evidence to support the claim that teenagers in rural areas drive more on average than the stated national average for teens.
Therefore, the correct conclusion is: B. We fail to reject the null, because the dad's sample did not provide enough evidence to conclude that the average miles per year driven by teens in rural areas is greater than the U.S. average.