The best answer depends on the specific content of the article, examining if it's structured around a problem-and-solution, chronological events, description, or a compare-and-contrast outline. Analyzing its structure involves understanding the order and connection between its parts, such as the introduction, evidence, and conclusion sections. The correct answer is option A.
The best answer to the question, 'Which answer best explains the overall structure of the article?' depends on the actual content and focus of the article in question. However, generally speaking, if the author identifies a problem that is causing the tower to tilt and presents ways to solve it, this indicates a problem-and-solution structure. In contrast, if the author describes a sequence of events showing how the tower has been affected by its environment over time, this implies a chronological or narrative structure.
A description-based approach would focus on providing information about the tower without necessarily focusing on change or problems. Finally, a compare and contrast method would highlight the differences between the past and present state of the tower.
Analyzing an article's structure involves understanding how it is put together, why the author has organized it in a particular way, and what connects the text from start to finish. This may involve looking at elements such as repeated words, ideas, and images, or how different paragraphs are used to build upon each other.
For clarification, an article with a problem-and-solution structure would typically have an introduction that outlines the problem, followed by a detailed explanation of the problem, evidence supporting its existence, and then a proposal of one or more solutions. On the other hand, a compare-and-contrast structure would have a different approach, usually emphasizing how the subject matter has changed over time or in different contexts.
Therefore, option A is correct.