Final answer:
According to postmodernism, coherence and consistency are seen as social constructs that are relative and dependent on individual perspectives and social dynamics. Logical consistency is not equated with truth, as postmodernists question the ability of human reason to ascertain absolute truths. Postmodernism promotes a pluralistic and relativistic view of knowledge and reality.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to postmodernism, coherence and consistency are viewed as relative rather than absolute terms. Postmodern thought challenges the traditional quest for a single, unifying truth, as found in the philosophies preceding it. This shift is rooted in the belief that realities are social constructs, with truth and meaning being subjective. Postmodernism suggests that what once was considered coherent or consistent could instead be a matter of perspective, shaped by language, power dynamics, and individual motivations. In particular, postmodern critique examines how societal factors influence human understanding of knowledge and encourages a skeptical approach toward absolute truths. Coherentism within postmodernism offers a different angle, comparing knowledge to a network of interconnected beliefs that support each other, much like a web. This framework shows that consistency and coherency gain relevance and strength from the interdependence of beliefs within a specific context.
The postmodern idea that there is no one reality, but multiple, concurrent realities impacted the notion of logical consistency. It argues that since human reason is inadequate for definitively achieving truth, a logically consistent set of beliefs does not automatically equate to truth. Furthermore, postmodernists renounce traditional metaphysics and philosophy, focusing instead on post-rational criticism. They emphasize the plurality of interpretations, adopt a relativistic view of truth, and seek to understand knowledge as a consequence of social constructs and power relations.