Final answer:
Jim and Sue should consider their financial stability and the need for a reliable vehicle over the desire for a new TV. The most financially responsible options are to use the money as a down payment towards a new car or to put it into savings, with the former potentially being the more practical choice.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jim and Sue are facing a common financial dilemma: prioritize a luxurious want or address a potential need. When considering Jim's unemployment and the aging car Sue relies on for commuting, creating a budget is essential for making an informed decision. The purchase of a 55" television for $1000 may fulfill a long-standing desire but does not seem prudent given their current financial uncertainties.
Option (a) buy a small TV at less cost and save some money, is a compromise but may still be an unnecessary expense. Option (b) buy the TV with the hope that the vehicle will continue to run, ignores the imminent risk of a breakdown which could then result in more financial strain. Option (c) suggests not purchasing the TV and instead, using the money as a down payment towards a new car, which could be a pragmatic approach since Sue's car is older and has already required costly repairs. Lastly, option (d) put the money into savings and wait until the car dies, is a conservative strategy that prioritizes financial stability over immediate gratification.
Given the described situation, the sensible choice would likely be between option (c) and (d), leaning towards preparing for a more reliable vehicle or securing savings for future emergencies or opportunities. The importance of a well-maintained vehicle for Sue's commute and their current financial situation suggests that option (c) might be the most financially responsible choice.