Final answer:
The statement 'The first acknowledges conventional wisdom; the second implies an alternative perspective' refers to the conflict between accepted beliefs and new evidence or contradictory views, often explored in philosophy. It emphasizes the distinction between intuitive, self-evident cognition and conclusions derived through education or reason.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'The first acknowledges conventional wisdom; the second implies something contradictory or an alternative perspective' suggests a dissonance between two ideas or concepts. The first part acknowledges what is generally accepted or believed, while the second challenges that belief or presents a different take on the subject. This dichotomy is often explored within the realm of philosophy, where conventional wisdom is juxtaposed against intuition or an emerging evidence that seeks to either reaffirm or dispute what is commonly held to be true.
In philosophy, reliance on intuition is linked to the cognition that is self-evident and impossible to deny, as opposed to conclusions derived from education or reason. Notably, the text references philosopher G.E. Moore, who employed common sense to argue against skepticism, asserting that having hands is a basic perception that cannot be sensibly doubted. Philosophical discussions often consider whether assertions rooted in common sense or intuition have the same evidential weight as those founded upon sensory evidence and reason. This distinction is crucial in assessing the validity of philosophical claims and in distinguishing between certain, evident intuitions and those that are merely subjective feelings or beliefs.