Final answer:
The statement is false; credibility of information is important even for background reading. Using Wikipedia requires caution, as it is not peer-reviewed, and while it can lead to more credible sources, it should not be the final source for academic research.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Since you will only use it for background reading, you don't need to worry about the credibility of a Wikipedia page.' is false. Even if the purpose is background reading, the credibility of sources is essential. Wikipedia, while a valuable starting point, is not entirely reliable due to its open-editing nature, which may introduce inaccuracies. To ensure the quality of your work, it's important to consult more authoritative sources that are peer-reviewed or professionally validated. Encyclopedic sites like Wikipedia should be used carefully, mainly to gain a general understanding or to find references to more credible sources. Newspaper articles and other pieces from credible websites can provide timely, albeit sometimes narrow, insights and are a step up in terms of reliability. While Wikipedia offers accessibility and a wealth of knowledge, the platform's dynamic nature means information can change frequently, sometimes without thorough vetting. The bibliographic information found in Wikipedia articles can lead to more credible, in-depth materials that are better suited for academic research. Understanding the appropriate use of various sources, including Wikipedia, is an invaluable skill that enhances research and the presentation of factual information.