Final answer:
The forms of wealth in a social marketplace include academic capital, cultural capital, and symbolic capital, but not vocational capital or linguistic capital according to the New York Times article on inequality in the US.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the New York Times article on inequality in the United States, the forms of wealth in a social marketplace include academic capital, cultural capital, and symbolic capital, but do not explicitly include vocational capital or linguistic capital. Academic capital refers to the institutionalized qualifications and educational attainments individuals possess, which can increase their social status and opportunities.
Cultural capital encompasses the skills, knowledge, and competencies that establish cultural authority, which are both material and non-material, such as embodied in attitudes or dialects. On the other hand, symbolic capital is derived from recognition, honor, or prestige, often interconnected with economic and social capital. For example, an athlete might have high symbolic capital, which could lead to increased social and economic opportunities through endorsements, unless a scandal diminishes that capital.
It is important to note that the NYT article and the work of Pierre Bourdieu, a sociologist who extensively explored these concepts, do not list vocational capital or linguistic capital as distinct forms of capital in the context of social markets and inequality. Therefore, while relevant in broader discussions of human capital, they are not mentioned as categories in the context addressed by the NYT.