Final answer:
Sandel argues against the demand to separate our identity as citizens from our moral and religious convictions. We should not abide by the limits of liberal public reason when discussing justice and rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
False. Sandel argues that when engaging in public discourse about justice and rights, we must not separate our identity as citizens from our moral and religious convictions. He believes that abiding by the limits of liberal public reason restricts our ability to bring our values and beliefs into the public sphere. Sandel argues for an inclusive public discourse that acknowledges and respects diverse moral and religious perspectives.