Final answer:
The statement is true; Sandel asserts that working through ethical dilemmas involves confronting confusion and resolving it as part of the dialectical process of moral inquiry.
Step-by-step explanation:
Michael J. Sandel, a prominent philosopher, does indeed suggest that engaging with ethical dilemmas involves grappling with the confusion that arises from them, as well as the challenge of resolving that confusion. The statement that Sandel argues that the purpose of working through ethical dilemmas is to feel the force of confusion, as well as the pressure of trying to sort out that confusion is true. Sandel's perspective is part of a broader discourse in philosophy that celebrates the ongoing, critical, and dialectical process of moral inquiry.
This process does not promise easy answers but rather supports moral agents in deepening their understanding of ethical principles and arguments, helping them to make more informed decisions. The pursuit of philosophical inquiry, including the application of the Hegelian Dialectic, encourages critical thinking and acknowledges that moral advancement and the resolution of conflicts require the continuous examination and re-examination of our beliefs and values.
In line with this approach, moral agents are advised to reflect critically on their beliefs, principles, and the reasoning that underpins their moral positions. The Post Modern Dialectical Process suggests that only through such rigorous and ongoing critique can we hope to arrive at moral positions that are better justified and potentially more universally acceptable.