Question

Sandel argues that if the moral individualist vision of freedom is right, then the critics of official apologies have a point.

a.true
b.false

Answer 1

Sandel's discussion relates to the tension between moral individualism and the notion of collective apologies, implying that if individual autonomy is prioritized, collective apologies might not hold genuine moral responsibility.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sandel's argument that if the moral individualist vision of freedom is correct, then the critics of official apologies may have a point, speaks to the philosophical debate around freedom and moral responsibility. Moral individualism places a strong emphasis on personal autonomy and individual choice, which critics argue could challenge the sincerity or meaning behind official apologies. If apologies are made based on societal pressure rather than individual conviction, they can be seen as lacking in genuine moral responsibility. This underscores a larger philosophical discussion surrounding ethical relativism, compatibilism, and the quest for universally applicable moral principles.