Final answer:
The statement is false; Sandel challenges the notion of neutral principles of justice. Instead, philosophers like Plato and John Rawls have tried to articulate principles that could direct governments toward justice, balancing freedom with social welfare.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Sandel argues that the government must attempt to find neutral principles of justice' is false. Michael Sandel, a renowned political philosopher, critiques the idea of a government pursuing so-called neutral principles of justice, arguing that such principles cannot truly be neutral as they would inevitably reflect some conception of the good life. On the contrary, philosophers like Plato and John Rawls have sought to establish principles of justice that could guide governments. Plato advocated for philosopher-kings who, being free from corruption, would ensure true justice. John Rawls developed a theory of justice that tries to balance human freedom and social welfare, contending that a legitimate government addresses the well-being of its citizens.