Final answer:
The Human Relations Movement focused on the importance of social needs in the workplace but led to work overload, conflict, and ambiguity in managerial roles, as well as difficult work relationships.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Human Relations Movement emerged as a reaction to the mechanistic view of management and sought to better account for the social needs of workers. However, it had some notable disadvantages:
- Work overload: The emphasis on social interaction often led to an increase in workload for employees and managers as they had to balance their task-related duties with the demands of maintaining social relationships.
- Conflict: The movement did not always clearly define managerial roles which could lead to tensions and conflict within the workplace as employees and managers struggled to understand their responsibilities.
- Ambiguity in defining the managerial role: The lack of a clear role definition sometimes resulted in managerial ambiguity, reducing the effectiveness of leadership and potentially creating uncertainty among staff.
- Difficult work relationships: While aiming to improve workplace relations, the movement could sometimes backfire, leading to overly complex interpersonal dynamics and difficult work relationships.